What about "Discworld"
Moderator: ScummVM Team
-
whodatfever
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:29 pm
What about "Discworld"
Any plans to support it? Also: The Dark Eye?
wrong forum - from the forum index:
The Junkyard
All the inane chatter goes in here. If you're curious about whether we will support a game, post HERE not in General Discussion
and searching the forums for "discworld" will give you 43 results... and then there's also http://wiki.scummvm.org/index.php/Discworld
hope that helps,
clem
edit: and the dark eye (DSA?) appears to be an RPG and not a "2D point-and-click adventure game"
The Junkyard
All the inane chatter goes in here. If you're curious about whether we will support a game, post HERE not in General Discussion
and searching the forums for "discworld" will give you 43 results... and then there's also http://wiki.scummvm.org/index.php/Discworld
hope that helps,
clem
edit: and the dark eye (DSA?) appears to be an RPG and not a "2D point-and-click adventure game"
Thanks for the info.-
DrMcCoy
- ScummVM Developer
- Posts: 595
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 1:33 pm
- Location: Braunschweig, Germany
- Contact:
Re: What about "Discworld"
I'd like to see that running on my system too. But it was made with some sort of authoring system and consists mainly of Quicktime movies. I don't think the chances of ScummVM supporting that are high...whodatfever wrote:Also: The Dark Eye?
I got dark eye running on my pc (XPsp2) with a little elbow grease.
Granted - I used my original copy to create the game folders on my hard drive.
One day I tried to see if one of the versions floating around on the net worked and I had no luck.
No emulator was needed, just a strategic placement of data folders on your c:\
Granted - I used my original copy to create the game folders on my hard drive.
One day I tried to see if one of the versions floating around on the net worked and I had no luck.
No emulator was needed, just a strategic placement of data folders on your c:\
haha, you're right - that's a bit of a loophole right nowPsYcO wrote:while theres no rule against it in these forums, i dont think the mods would be 2 happy about it...Monolith wrote:YES please! Please give us Discworld i'm beggin' you! i'll even post nude picture of my wife or my neighbors daughter
forum rule #3 (keep the focus on questions) doesn't apply because it's not a question
forum rule #4 (no profanity) - I wonder if that applies to pictures as well or only text?
forum rule #6 (keep the size of personal images down) - doesn't per se forbid you to post "personal" images
I just hope I'm not putting fleas in anyone's ears here...
clem
OK, I know you guys are only kidding, but still, just to make this crystal clear: The forum rules are not like a law text with "loop holes". We act on the spirit of them -- if somebody thinks (s)he could argue against a ban because of a "loophole in the forum rules", that person is gravely mistaken. 
so porn is aloud then?fingolfin wrote:OK, I know you guys are only kidding, but still, just to make this crystal clear: The forum rules are not like a law text with "loop holes". We act on the spirit of them -- if somebody thinks (s)he could argue against a ban because of a "loophole in the forum rules", that person is gravely mistaken.
it just is a lot easier saying "banned for violation of forum rule <unsigned char>" than writing "banned for violating common sense" - from what I've seen on the net so far, common sense does not seem to existfingolfin wrote:OK, I know you guys are only kidding, but still, just to make this crystal clear: The forum rules are not like a law text with "loop holes". We act on the spirit of them -- if somebody thinks (s)he could argue against a ban because of a "loophole in the forum rules", that person is gravely mistaken.
just kidding, of course!
clem
clem wrote:forum rule #4 (no profanity) - I wonder if that applies to pictures as well or only text?
forum rule #6 (keep the size of personal images down) - doesn't per se forbid you to post "personal" images
in most case's naked people arn't vulgarWikipedia wrote:Profanity is “the quality or state of being profane”. It can also relate to using profane language, or desecration or disrespect toward an object of religious veneration.[1] It can be a word, expression, gesture, or other social behavior which is socially constructed or interpreted as insulting, rude, or vulgar.
you could always use thumbnails and host them on a image hosting site
rofl, if only there was a repping system on these boardsclem wrote:it just is a lot easier saying "banned for violation of forum rule <unsigned char>" than writing "banned for violating common sense" - from what I've seen on the net so far, common sense does not seem to existfingolfin wrote:OK, I know you guys are only kidding, but still, just to make this crystal clear: The forum rules are not like a law text with "loop holes". We act on the spirit of them -- if somebody thinks (s)he could argue against a ban because of a "loophole in the forum rules", that person is gravely mistaken.
just kidding, of course!
clem