Download still links to v0.11.0

[id1402]

Hello.
I tried to download "ScummVM - Source RPM" from http://scummvm.org/downloads.php#source but it is still linked to "scummvm-0.11.0-1.src.rpm" instead of "scummvm-0.11.1-1.src.rpm".

There are many users who prefer src.rpm instead of tar and zip, since it's much easier to install on systems like Suse.

Can anyone fix it?

[sev]

Fixed. Thanks for pointing it out.


Eugene

[id1402]

Thanks for fixing.
Downloaded, compiled and installed successfully.

[id1402]

sev, do you know, who is responsible for scummvm.src.rpm files?
The newest release scummvm-0.12.0-1.src.rpm on the download page ScummVM doesn't work. Download works, but it doesn't compile.

[wjp]

That would be me. On which platform does it fail to build? What's the error message you get?

-Willem Jan

[id1402]

Hello wjp. You do a great job. Everything is ok. My first download of scummvm-0.12.0-1.src.rpm resulted in a damaged scummvm-0.12.0-1.src.rpm on my harddisk. I searched hardly for MD5 checksum, but nothing found on http://www.scummvm.org/downloads.php . Since I never had problems with a downloaded file before, I didn't try a new download of the file. I wrote a bug report, sev wrote the MD5 checksum and I compared with my MD5 checksum. Checksums were different, I did a new download of scummvm-0.12.0-1.src.rpm, checksum was correct, scummvm-0.12.0-1.src.rpm compiled and installed successfully. It would be necessary to write MD5 checksums of the packages on http://www.scummvm.org/downloads.php to avoid such useless bug reports.

wjp, thank you for the great src.rpm packages. Very good work.

I have a last question. What is the function "--target=" for?
I did

Code: Select all

rpmbuild --rebuild --target=i586

Code: Select all

rpmbuild --rebuild --target=i686

Code: Select all

rpmbuild --rebuild --target=athlon

Everything compile well and I have 3 different rpm files. The rpms can be installed and ScummVM runs well. I tested the 3 different versions with different games. So what's the difference? Should a version run faster on my system than the other 2? I think, they run equally good, it's my feeling.
My system:

Code: Select all

# uname -a
Linux axis 2.6.13-15.12-default #1 Thu Aug 24 11:23:58 UTC 2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux

Code: Select all

# cat /etc/SuSE-release
SUSE LINUX 10.0 (i586) OSS

Code: Select all

# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : AuthenticAMD
cpu family      : 6
model           : 8
model name      : AMD Sempron(tm) 2800+
stepping        : 1
cpu MHz         : 1999.875
cache size      : 256 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 1
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mp mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow
bogomips        : 4007.81

Should I compile for i586, i686 or athlon?

[wjp]

It shouldn't matter too much. It looks like 'athlon' will give the binary most optimized for your CPU, though.

[id1402]

Ok.

Will there ever be a source package of scummvm-tools-0.12.0? All source packages on the download page still link to v0.11.0.

[fingolfin]

Oops! Actually, there is a 0.12.0 source RPM, the links on our download page were just wrong. I just fixed it. Thanks for pointing this out.

[id1402]

Thank you.

[id1402]

I downloaded scummvm-tools-0.12.0-1.src.rpm, but it doesn't compile properly.
I wrote the problem in the Suse packages thread: http://forums.scummvm.org/viewtopic.php?p=39635