I already figured that out. Unfortunately I am not so proficient in that sort of stuff. But obviously it would have been easier to accomplished if people already thought about adding this feature when programming. I think, since there is no possibility for an access to an external txt file, the easiest way would be language patches that overwrite the texts in the compiled version.md5 wrote: The problem is not with the translation of the interface strings, but with finding someone willing to work on the code and produce an efficient solution which would work with all kinds of languages
What I think is arrogant is to believe that English is the universal language everybody has to understand. There are, for instance American blokes going to guy in Paris and asking him how to get to the Eiffel tower in English without even asking the other person whether he can speak English.pncFreak wrote: What I think is arrogant is to expect everything to be available in ones native language. English IS the international language people use to bridge the gap between other languages, and people who don't speak English miss out on a lot of things. So it's easy: either learn English and access a plethora of products, or don't - and miss out on a lot of things
English is a lingua franca in many ways in the western world. But it is far away from being an universal language. And why does it have to be English? Why can't the guy in Paris expect the tourist to put their question in French?
By the way, I would like to see the reaction when you tell a 45 yo dairy farmer from the Camargue that he has to learn English. Your claim is so far from reality...